All runbooks
runbookuapiredacted view

UAPI GLM 5.2 First Wedge Review 2026-06-22

GLM 5.2 first-wedge review and Gate D blocker report for UAPI Interpreter/Conductor/Foundry work.

Updated 2026-06-22·Freshness: Reference·Sensitive tokens or credentials were hidden before display.

UAPI GLM 5.2 First Wedge Review 2026-06-22

GLM 5.2 first-wedge review and Gate D blocker report for UAPI Interpreter/Conductor/Foundry work.

Promotion Metadata

  • Source feedback id: 92
  • Source feedback ids: 92
  • Promotion request id: 29
  • Feedback category: beneficial
  • Feedback source: glm-5.2-interpreter-conductor-first-wedge
  • Feedback created at: 2026-06-22T16:51:44.510333+00:00
  • Target slug: [REDACTED:high-entropy]
  • Review state: review
  • Reviewer note: AI lane auto-promoted redacted feedback into internal catalog context.

Source Feedback Body

Feedback 92

  • Product: uapi
  • Category: beneficial
  • Related slug: [REDACTED:high-entropy]
  • Source: glm-5.2-interpreter-conductor-first-wedge
  • Created at: 2026-06-22T16:51:44.510333+00:00

GLM 5.2 diary 2026-06-22 (Interpreter/Conductor first-wedge review, plan-only authority).

Boot verified: /ready v0.2.3 ready public_safe_mode=true redaction_boundary=server-side; bootstrap audit 712 (user ai-operator role=ai); 14 primary_context fetched audits 716-729 (11 required + 3 optional, all accessible_to_session=true, all raw_available_to_client=false); 4 named UAPI docs fetched audits 730-733 (master-program-control, glm52-builder-and-first-wedge, integrated-operating-plan-v2, [REDACTED:high-entropy]); 6 additional UAPI lane docs fetched audits 738-743 (codex-schema-diary-2026-06-22, [REDACTED:high-entropy], core-contracts-v0, job-routing-contracts-v0, auth-identity-contracts-v0, multi-agent-coordination-directive).

Scenario tested: none. Plan-only review, no code, no adapter execution. Adapter mode this session: not applicable (read-only review). Gates encountered: ready-check, bootstrap, primary_context fetch, named-plan fetch, cross-lane contract read.

Schema dependencies (Codex-published, treat as authoritative): UnifiedIdentityPrincipal, LoginSession, ServiceToken, DeviceIdentity, ServiceEndpoint, JobBrief, EventEnvelope, GateRecord, PlacementDecision, RunRecord, ResultPacket, EmbeddingJob, PolicyBundle, ProviderAdapter, StorageCapacity. Field sets fixed in [REDACTED:high-entropy]. adapter_mode enum = mock|sandbox|live. confidence enum = exploratory|candidate|production_capable. data_class enum = public_safe|internal|sensitive|secret_disallowed.

Route assumptions: none introduced. Grok-owned friendly route names already in catalog (audit 739): local.nuc.gemma.npu, .140t, cloud.colab.gpu.burst. GLM lane defers all route naming to Grok.

Demo evidence: none yet. Deterministic demo is a future wedge deliverable per integrated-operating-plan-v2 MVP step 10 and GLM runbook deliverable 4 (operator request -> JobBrief -> PlacementDecision -> RunRecord -> ResultPacket -> Explorer-visible evidence).

Blockers (cross-agent schema contradictions; master-program-control Gate D requires resolution before merge; per user instruction GLM must not invent conflicting schemas, so GLM cannot publish first-wedge spec until these are resolved): 1. ResultPacket (Codex audits 740+741, GLM runbook audit 731) vs ResultPackage (integrated plan audit 732, chatgpt image audit 733). Codex name should win; plan v2 + chatgpt image prose needs cleanup. 2. EventEnvelope (Codex audit 740) vs ProgressEvent (plan v2 + chatgpt image). 3. GateRecord (Codex audit 740, single record with gate_type/decision/evidence_refs) vs OperatorGateRequest + OperatorGateResponse (plan v2 + chatgpt image, two separate records). 4. UnifiedIdentityPrincipal (Codex audits 740+742) vs Identity (plan v2 + chatgpt image). 5. LoginSession (Codex audit 742) vs SessionRecord (plan v2 + chatgpt image). 6. ToolManifest (plan v2 + chatgpt image) is not in Codex core-contracts-v0; likely maps to ProviderAdapter. Codex ruling needed.

Next GLM step (after Codex resolves contradictions, likely by adopting Codex names and a v3 cleanup pass on plan v2 + chatgpt image): publish Interpreter state-machine spec (Collecting -> NeedsInput -> Ready -> Submitted), Conductor gateway trait (submit(JobBrief) -> Stream; onOperatorGate(GateRecord) -> GateRecord; finalize() -> ResultPacket), mock-vs-real adapter graduation checklist (mock -> sandbox -> live with shadow+canary+rollback gates per plan v2), deterministic demo acceptance test (one operator scenario, mock Conductor, operator-gate exercised, RunRecord + ResultPacket recorded, evidence visible in Explorer). GLM will not publish any new schema or route name until contradictions 1-6 are resolved.

No secrets, raw tokens, private paths, or unredacted credentials in this note.